Bruce WainwrightBruce Wainwright

Olden wonder

A FATAL CASE OF
EMBARRASSMENT

The facility with which young people (by which I mean anyone under the age of 45) can handle the latest technology never ceases to amaze me. Of course, parents who rely on their infant offspring to programme the video are legendary, but we’ve moved far beyond that now.
Kids who find it difficult to identify the capital of France or confuse Waterloo and Agincourt can somehow manage to text the equivalent of War and Peace in a matter of minutes and navigate their iPods at the same time.
But, for reasons which have hitherto escaped me, it seems they cannot comprehend the technicalities of the rubber condom, with results which are all too regularly chronicled in these pages.
I cannot believe, however, that the reason lies entirely in ignorance. Most of us, surely, know what condoms are for and how and when to use them. Somehow, the message gets lost on the way to the bedroom, for reasons which are indicated in research carried out by Dolores Albarracin, at the University of Florida. This appears to suggest that the 354 HIV awareness campaigns she investigated had little, if any, impact on behaviour and were largely a waste of money.
IllustrationThis research confirms what Graham Greene observed decades ago in his novel, The Ministry of Fear: we (and in those days he particularly meant the white English middle classes) would rather end up dead sooner than cause a public scene. It was true then and it’s all too often true today. We will die, not only of ignorance, but of embarrassment brought about by social awkwardness. Are we to risk losing a partner by ignoring the sweet talk and insisting on a condom? Do we risk getting the brush-off by saying ‘no’? Are we just too embarrassed even to admit that we forgot to buy some? What’s lacking is not only knowledge but negotiating skills. Whether it’s teenagers at school, African women or gay men on the club scene, they all need the skill and assertiveness to ask the relevant questions, know where they want to draw the line, and in doing so, protect themselves. These skills are learned, and someone needs to teach them; we certainly haven’t been born with them.
The problem is that teaching in this kind of way is going to be painfully slow. Quite small groups working to inform and hone personal skills have been shown to be the most effective in changing behaviour, but they are, by their very nature, small. Additionally, the research strongly suggests that one size definitely doesn’t fit all. Each group, whether it is African women, young gay men or Asians, have needs and expectations which are different, and therefore, need their own specific approach. What works for one won’t necessarily work for another.
It also involves money, and probably quite a lot of it. So, I would argue that if, in the unlikely event that there is any spare cash around, and the primary care trusts haven’t used it to shore up their balance sheets, it should go to schools and other organisations which are prepared to develop these skills. At the very least, we should look with a more than usually critical eye at any publicity campaign aimed at changing behaviour. Chances are that it’s money poorly spent.
• brucefirst@googlemail.com

back to top of page

back to contents - Issue 122

 

Skip Links