PN Feature


Coming Soon to a Clinic near you?


A few new drugs to fight HIV created a buzz at the World Aids conference in Toronto, and if we’re lucky, they could be with us within the year. Robert Fieldhouse reports

Illustration: C(Aitch)

IllustrationUnlike the Vancouver World Aids Conference ten years ago, it was prevention technologies like microbicides, rather than HIV drugs themselves, that hogged the limelight at Toronto this summer. But amid the clamour around the use of antiretroviral drugs for HIV prevention, we found new studies on new drugs that may shape the future of HIV therapy. If all goes to plan, you may well see some of these drugs in your clinic in the coming months or years.

Integrase inhibitors

Integrase is an enzyme which HIV uses to insert its genetic material (DNA) into the DNA of human cells such as our CD4 cells. Investigational integrase inhibitors may offer us a way to stymie HIV’s ability to reproduce itself. The integrase inhibitor furthest along is known rather blandly as MK-0518. Latest research presented in Toronto shows the drug has potent activity across a range of doses and is well-tolerated by people starting their first HAART combo. Those that need this drug most are people who have used all three classes of HIV drugs (PIs, nukes and non-nukes) and those with drug resistance. Now, however, the evidence shows it’s also looking good for people starting therapy for the first time.

Holding back the nukes

MK-0518 appears so potent it may even herald a new approach to HIV treatments;
manufacturer Merck also produces efavirenz (Sustiva), so it’s possible that in the future MK-0518 may be studied as part of a two drug combo; with efavirenz-without nukes.
This would allow people to hold back from taking drugs from the nucleoside analogue family such as AZT or 3TC for second-line therapy. Right now, it’s being studied as part of a triple combination.

Who they studied

At Toronto, Dr Martin Markowitz of the Aaron Diamond Aids Research Center in New York presented 24 week data for MK-0518 taken with tenofovir (Viread) and 3TC (Epivir). This combo was compared with a triple combo of efavirenz plus tenofovir and 3TC. The team enrolled 198 people who had never used antiretroviral therapy before, who had a viral load of 5,000 copies or more and who had CD4 cell counts of 100 or over. Most were men, the average age was 36 and one in three had Aids. MK-0518 was studied at a range of doses (100, 200, 300, 400 or 600mg twice-daily). Efavirenz was given at 600mg once-daily. A total of 160 patients were put into one of the five MK-0518 treatment groups and 38 people were in the efavirenz group.

Rapid viral suppression

MK-0518 showed potent antiretroviral activity regardless of dose and HIV viral load fell rapidly between the first and second week of starting therapy for all people taking the integrase inhibitor. By week 24, 90 per cent of people receiving any dose of MK-0518 achieved a viral load of less than 400 copies. Most saw their CD4 counts double by the end of the trial. MK-0518 was very well tolerated. Most side effects were mild and similar in all groups and included headache, nausea and dizziness. There were eight serious adverse events, but none was considered treatment-related.
A phase III study using a 400mg dose of MK-0518 is now underway. Although this drug is not being studied at any clinical trial sites in the UK, it may soon be available to those who really need it through a special arrangement called ‘expanded access’. Merck said it would be made available within the next few months through an expanded access programme for people who have exhausted other treatment options and who were at risk of clinical illness or immunologic decline.

Monoclonal antibodies

TNX-355 is an artificial human antibody that binds to the CD4 receptor, blocking the path of HIV into host cells such as CD4s. Researchers studied TNX-355 alongside an optimised background regimen (OBR) of other antiretroviral drugs chosen by drug resistance testing and compared it with an optimised background therapy plus a placebo drug.
In total, 82 people who had used triple-class antiretroviral therapy were enrolled. Most were men with an average age of 46. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either placebo or intravenous TNX-355 in one of two doses. Twenty-eight received 10mg per kg of body weight once a week for nine doses, followed by 10mg per kg of body weight every two weeks. Twenty-seven received 15mg per kg of body weight once every two weeks.
After 48 weeks, researchers saw a one-log reduction in viral loads (one-log is around 90 per cent).
Meanwhile, viral load only fell by 0.14 log in the placebo arm.
It took participants an average of 230-253 days to experience virological failure in the TNX-355 arms, while those in the placebo arm experienced failure immediately. CD4 cell increases were greater in the TNX-355 arms (48-51 cells) compared to the placebo arm (0 cells). No serious side effects, including injection reactions, were repoted.
The researchers concluded: “TNX-355 in combination with an optimised background regime results in a statistically significant difference in viral load reduction compared to placebo plus optimised background regimen at week 48. Treatment with TNX-355 is associated with durable viral load reductions and clinically meaningful increases in CD4 counts in treatment-experienced patients."

CCR5 inhibitors

HIV uses the CCR5 co-receptor to enter CD4 cells in up to 85 per cent of people who have never been on HIV therapy. When people are treatment experienced with antiretroviral drugs, HIV uses the CCR5 co-receptor approximately 50-60 per cent of the time. HIV can also enter CD4 cells through the CXCR4 co-receptor.
The virus’ tendency to use CCR5 (R5) or CXCR4 (X4), or both, is called “tropism.” CXCR4-tropic HIV is associated with a more rapid decline in CD4 cells and more rapid HIV disease progression.

Vicriviroc

Vicriviroc is an investigational CCR5 inhibitor from Schering Plough pharmaceuticals. Dr Roy Gulick, of Cornell University, New York presented results from a 48-week study in treatment-experienced patients with R5-topic virus taking ritonavir-containing HAART with a viral load above 5,000 copies.
Vicriviroc was given at a range of doses (5, 10, or 15mg daily) or placebo for 14 days; then background antiretrovirals were chosen. Virologic failure occurred if their viral load declined by less than 1 log (a tenfold or 90 per cent reduction) after week 16. The object was to suppress the virus within 14 days.

Fast and sustainable

Researchers discontinued the 5mg dose early on following a recommendation from the study monitoring committee following reports of five malignancies. The study was unblinded (researchers and patients knew exactly who had been receiving what) allowing them to do this.
In total, 118 patients were randomised with average viral load of 36,380 copies and CD4 counts averaging 146 cells. People receiving any of the vicriviroc doses achieved greater viral load decreases than people receiving placebo. Two people receiving vicriviroc developed Hodgkin’s disease, two developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and one developed gastric adenocarcinoma.
The researchers concluded that in treatment-experienced patients, vicriviroc demonstrated potent 14-day virologic suppression and, following optimisation of background antiretrovirals, sustained antiretroviral activity over 24 weeks.They added that the relationship between vicriviroc and malignancy was “uncertain".

Maraviroc

Maraviroc is Pfizer’s investigational CCR5 inhibitor. It works by preventing the virus from entering CD4 cells by blocking its most common entry route; the CCR5 co-receptor.
Pfizer conducted a 24-week study to look at the effects of maraviroc in people whose HIV uses both the R5 and/or X4 co-receptors to infect cells. It is important to find out whether taking a CCR5 inhibitor may lead HIV to increasingly infect cells using a different route: the X4 receptor, and whether this leads to a more rapid CD4 cell count loss. The study recruited 186 treatment-experienced patients with advanced disease. Pfizer used something called a “trofile” diagnostic test to select suitable patients which shows which route or routes a virus is using to infect cells. Patients received the best available combination plus placebo, or one of two doses of maraviroc once- or twice-daily.
Results showed viral load reduction were fairly similar for those receiving maraviroc a day (-0.91 log) or placebo (-0.97 log), and slightly greater among people receiving maraviroc twice a day (-1.20 log). CD4 cell count rises were higher among people receiving maraviroc (plus 60 cells, once-daily and plus 62 cells, twice-daily) compared to an additional 35 cells for placebo.
Most importantly, researchers identified no evidence of harm by adding CCR5 to the treatment of people with dual/mixed tropic virus. Maraviroc is now in Phase III studies. Results of this study in dual/mixed-tropic patients will be evaluated alongside those from ongoing, fully-enrolled, global studies in both treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients with R5-tropic HIV. These are the populations most likely to show maraviroc’s effectiveness. Expanded access is likely to begin within the next six months.

Protease inhibitors

Professor Sharon Walmsley, of Toronto General Hospital, reported data from patients who had reached 48 weeks of treatment in the POWER 1 and POWER 2 studies of TMC 114 (Prezista) taken with ritonavir.
The highest dose studied in this trial (600/100mg twice daily) produced the best virologic response. The findings shed light on the long-term efficacy and safety of TMC 114/r against comparator PIs.
In both trials, PI, nuke and NNRTI-experienced individuals, with at least one primary protease inhibitor drug resistance mutation, were randomised to receive an optimised background regimen plus one of four TMC 114/r doses or a boosted comparator PI.

Significant viral load cut

People on TMC114/r were significantly more likely to achieve a one log reduction in their viral load compared to people in the comparator PI group.
Two thirds of those receiving TMC 114 achieved a one log (90 per cent) or greater viral load reduction over 48 weeks. This compared with just 15 percent of the people receiving a comparator PI.
Around half achieved an undetectable viral load (less than 50 copies) compared with ten percent of those receiving a comparator PI. CD4 cells increased by an average of 102 cells compared to 19 cells. The most commonly reported side effects among patients in the TMC 114/r arm vs. control arm were diarrhoea (20 percent vs 28 pe cent), nausea (18 per cent vs 13 per cent), headache (15 per cent vs 20 percent) and inflammed nose or throat (14 per cent vs 11 per cent). Seven per cent of the people on TMC 114 stopped due to side effects compared to five per cent in the control arm.
TMC114/r has demonstrated sustained efficacy in this treatment-experienced population. Its tolerability profile is similar to that of comparator protease inhibitors but it seems to cause less diarrhoea.

Non-nukes

We are witnessing the birth of the next generation of non-nukes (non-noculeoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTIs) with TMC125. Data were presented at Toronto which showed the drug was effective against non nuke resistant strains. For this study, 199 people with documented non-nuke resistance and three or more PI drug resistance mutations were randomised to TMC 125 (400mg or 800mg twice-daily) plus background antiretroviral drugs. These were compared with 40 others given the best available control combination.
By week 48 the average decline in HIV viral load was -0.88, -1.01 and -0.14 log copies in the TMC125 400mg and 800mg twice-daily and active control groups.
Around one in five in the TMC125 groups reported side effects like diarrhoea and rashes, more than in the control groups. The researchers said TMC125 showed high rates of sustained efficacy at 48 weeks in heavily pre-treated patients. “TMC125 retains activity in the presence of multiple NNRTI mutations where current NNRTIs, nevirapine or efavirenz, are not expected to be effective."
It’s an exciting time for antiretroviral therapy. Many other drugs were featured at Toronto and we will bring you news of their development in the coming months in Treatment News.




back to contents - Issue 126

back to top of page

Skip Links