column - caroline guinness


Amanda Elliot, managing editor





Will the NHS pay?

This year is shaping up to be exciting as far as new and improved HIV therapies are concerned.
So much so, some US doctors, not normally given to grandiose claims, have made comparisons with the arrival of HAART in the mid-1990s.
Most of the fizz and fuss surround Merck’s raltegravir and Pfizer’s maraviroc; two new drug classes that fight HIV replication in different ways from currently available drugs.
Studies suggest they are safe and very effective. Though unavailable right now outside clinical trials, they are likely to arrive within the next 18 months.
Neither pill is a magic bullet; both still have to be used with older drugs (see current and past Treatment News pages). Nonetheless, they are important new weapons for fighting HIV and drug resistance and represent a massive expansion in treatment options.
Add to this Tibotec’s newly licensed PI darunavir/r and it’s all round terrific news for people on failing regimes fast running out of HIV drugs options. “These drugs will provide extended years of meaningful survival to patients,” declared one doctor.
There’s good news also for people starting therapy; Gilead Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck are soon to launch their three-in-one co-formulated once-daily pill in Europe. Already available in the US, Atripla combines the big guns efavirenz and tenofovir with nucleoside FTC.
But as with all new HIV drugs – when all these finally arrive they will carry price tags that reflect their newness and pioneering nature.
In reality this means all people with HIV who want to switch to, or start on, these new drugs may not get the chance sometime soon.
With this in mind, PN takes a closer look this month at who decides which HIV drugs are available at your clinic and when they can be prescribed.
We found cost is increasingly influencing prescribing decisions in the UK. Doctors are delaying starting people on therapies until the new financial year to avoid further busting this year’s drug budget, while some persist with starting people on cheaper HIV drugs that, while highly effective, are associated with fat loss and anaemia. Meanwhile, London’s Mortimer Market clinic is also taking a hard (cost-driven) look at CD4 and other tests to see if some stable patients with HIV can get by with fewer.
It’s clear the pressure is on and is not going to go away. But people unhappy with their regimens – who find them hard to tolerate or take as prescribed – should not suffer in silence. You may not always get exactly what you want but now more than ever people should be asking ‘what’s the alternative?’ because very soon there will be many more effective regimens to choose from.


Amanda Elliot, managing editor

back to top of page

back to contents - Issue 131

Skip Links