regulars - issue 73/74
letters
positive nation

his honour is honoured

It was lovely to receive (after some apparent diversions) your letter of 30 July enclosing the Positive Nation Award. I much appreciate receiving it and am honoured to have been voted into this position by your readers. Suitably framed, it is going up onto my study wall very shortly! Every strength with the continuing work.
Edwin Cameron, Supreme Court Of Appeal, Bloemfontein, South Africa

page 1 of 4

1 / 2 / 3 / 4

home

contents of issue 73/74
back issues
the gazette
recipes
small ads
contacting us
weblinks

consulted or insulted?
I'm not sure what to do with the National Strategy for Sexual Health and HIV questionnaire in the last issue of Positive Nation.
"Make a noise and get involved", says the UK Coalition's Ruth Webb. But Ian Kramer and Paul McCrory, the HIV 'experts' during the Strategy's consultation phase, say they felt they were only involved as tokens. Will my filled-in questionnaire also allow decision-makers to say they consulted me, as they toss my feedback in the bin and slash services anyway? I doubt whether further to this 'consultation' HIV infection rates will fall or the quality of life of PWHIVs improve.
Anyway, as a professional journalist I cannot imagine more than a tenth of respondents actually being able to fill the bloody thing in correctly. Hands up who knows what "targeted service networks and strategies" are?
Marcel Wiel, London NW1

Write to:
Letters, Positive Nation,
250 Kennington Lane, London SE11 5RD or send an email to
the
editor or fax 020 7564
2128. Please include your
address and phone number
although these will not be
published. Letters may be
edited for length.

who teaches the doctors?
Ruth's article 'Divided we will fail' (PN November) is somewhat alarming

previous page (greyed out)next page