regulars - issue 73/74

speak up

Positive Nation

while sick or living on £40 a week?

page 2 of 3

1 / 2 / 3

home

contents of issue 75
back issues
the gazette
recipes
small ads
contacting us
weblinks

Getting a high level of benefit support is as random as a lottery ticket. These days two people can find themselves on completely different levels of financial support, unrelated to need. For example, I recently met someone with PML (a condition that causes brain damage) who doesn't even get income support. His friend, who is also positive but in fantastic health, gets the maximum amount of benefit support available.
We need a national project addressing benefit inequalities like this. The actual level of benefit inequality among positive people needs to be researched and addressed now, with recommendations sent to the relevant government bodies concerned.
Positive Nation magazine regularly publishes aggressive drug company advertising. How is it possible for a magazine reader to make an informed choice about when to start combination therapy when drug company adverts receive so much more prominence in your magazine than NAM's Aids Treatment Update? How balanced is your editorial policy? Is it fair and responsible for a UK Coalition of People with HIV to accept money for promoting drug company products?
Your survival as an organisation may depend on drug company advertising, but for some of us our survival depends on you. We require a balanced presentation of the facts regarding HIV treatments. Adverts can be as seductive as they are misleading.

And what about organisations who say that they cannot accept applications

previous pagenext page