features - issue 82
we have FAILED prevention
positive nation

highlighted in several presentations. Two studies from the US and Europe followed 700 people and found that only two became HIV positive after a post-exposure course of

antiretrovirals.
A report from the Congo showed that of 111 who had received antiretroviral therapy following rape, none developed HIV infection, and only three experienced side effects.
And pre-exposure prophylaxis - 'chemical vaccination' - was a major new strand at the Barcelona conference. This means giving antiretrovirals to prevent infection in those who are at continual high risk - for instance sex workers or HIV negative partners of positive people. Microbicides incorporating anti-HIV drugs like tenofovir and the new non-nucleoside dapivirine are also undergoing trials.
Trials have also looked at continuous low-dose 'presumptive treatment' with antibiotics to prevent sexually transmitted diseases - and to see if the HIV transmission rate also falls. Two studies have placed South African gold miners and Nairobi sex workers on antibiotics to see if STDs and HIV transmission could be prevented, though whether the HIV transmission rate was reduced has yet to be revealed.
Circumcision
Dr. Helene Gayle mentioned male circumcision as a possible mode of HIV prevention in the developing world - something which is still very controversial. At a press briefing she said: "If male circumcision offers 50 per cent protective effect, why has this not been discussed more seriously, when we're investing so much in microbicides that report 60 per cent success?"
Although 21 out of 27 observational studies have found a reduced risk of infection among uncircumcised men, questions remain about whether lacking a foreskin works as a preventative, or whether cultural behaviour associated with circumcised men (Moslems, who are circumcised, do not use alcohol, for instance) explains the difference.
The first intervention study is underway in Kenya, circumcising men between 18-24 and following them for two years to see whether circumcision alone is protective. It might just be circumcision

page 4 of 5

1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5

home

contents of issue 82
back issues
the gazette
recipes
small ads
contacting us
weblinks

during infancy that is effective in preventing transmission.
To add to the confusion, two studies from India and Brazil found that being uncircumcised

previous pagenext page