|
almost 1,000 patients who had been failed by all three
current classes of HIV drugs - nukes, non-nukes, and protease inhibitors.
Two-thirds of patients were put on T-20 plus the best combo of oral drugs
doctors could devise (based on drug resistance tests), while one-third
did without it.
In the TORO 2 study, the T-20 patients experienced an average 27-fold
viral load drop, whereas the patients on oral drugs alone only had an
average 4.5-fold drop. Unsurprisingly in such a treatment-experienced
group the proportion reaching viral undetectability was small, with only
12 per cent on T-20 achieving a viral load under 50, and 5.3 per cent
not on T-20. The T-20 patients saw an average CD4 increase of 65, compared
with 38 in the other group.
In the trial group, only three per cent of the T-20 patients couldn't
tolerate the injections, but virtually all of them had 'injection site
reactions'. This means reddening, itching or lumps around the injection
sites in the skin of the stomach, thighs or arms - and in a quarter these
lumps were persistent.
Another fusion inhibitor, T-1249, is following in T-20's wake, and Danny
Bolognesi, managing director of manufacturers Trimeris, said that this
so far appeared more potent, less likely to cause HIV resistance, and
can be injected much less often.
|
|