regulars - issue 87
comment
positive nation

Why is ‘Patient Power’ so boring?

As well as the patient power piece in this issue (‘Service as Usual’), take a look at the news snippet on page 10 about the DoH’s recently completed report on Patient Involvement (see www.doh.gov.uk/involvingpatients/).
But while Patient Power may be a Good Thing, by god the subject is boring.
Another recent report ruefully acknowledges this. The HIV Community Involvement Project (HCIP) was an offshoot of the attempt to formulate London’s own HIV Strategy (which, as far as we know, has not so far appeared).
Well, they had lots of meetings, and made lots of recommendations. But the main conclusion they were forced to reach was how few of the Community could be arsed to Be Involved.
This was the summation after the poor response: “There was little interest in developing HCIP further once the consultation exercise was over...there had been no recent demand for such a project, and maybe it was the wrong time to establish one at all.”
Why? Well, for a start, the report says,: “The only service many positive people now access is their clinic and the only service providers they see are medical professionals. Advice is accessed on a more individual, private basis - through, for example, websites” (and magazines, we could add). Then there is the fragmentation of the ‘HIV community’: “When people choose to meet together it is now more likely to be on the basis of a shared identity as well as a shared virus - as African, gay, asylum seeker, women, parent or some other identity.”
But, above all, there is one reason HIV can’t, and never will, fit into the Brave New NHS aim of local community power. People with HIV are not representative of local Mr or Ms average. We tend to be within small, tightly-defined groups, often isolated by stigma from the community at large around us.
And yet, patient power and representation is more of a necessity than ever for people with HIV in these fragmented times. As we sit here writing this, a reader phones up; HIV negative pregnant wife of positive husband with low CD4 count. She has nasty viral symptoms, worried for husband, GP refers to A&E.

Husband declares his status. Consultant then tells wife, without the slightest medical evidence, “I think you might be seroconverting” (after 18 monogamous years of not doing so). Insists on

previous page (unavailable)next page

page 1 of 2

1 / 2

click here for homepage
click here for contents of the current issue
click here for our online back catalogue
click hee to view this month's gazette
click here for some yummy recipes
click here for our online small ads
click here for details on getting in touch with us
click here for useful websites